Your product is multi-tenant. Your access model is still a network.
Production, staging and the toolchain governed by identity and device instead of by who is inside the VPN, with no concentrator sitting in the path.
- ISO 27001_
- SOC 2 expectations_
- DPDP Act_
- Customer-contract security clauses_
SaaS companies are distributed on purpose: engineers in several places, support following the sun, partners and contractors in the toolchain, and workloads spread across more than one cloud because that is what shipping quickly produced. The one thing tying the estate together is usually a VPN, which is simultaneously the latency complaint in every retro and the widest blast radius in the architecture.
Meanwhile the people who buy the product ask how production is reached and by whom, and expect an answer that is a control rather than a paragraph in a policy document. Staging environments carrying real data, an internal tool published “temporarily”, and a leaver whose SSH key is still in a config file are the three findings that keep coming back.
The five or six places this actually changes something.
- Production accessSSH, RDP, database and console sessions into production are issued per person against the directory, with the record of the session attached, instead of a shared key and a bastion everyone has the address of.DevOps Security
- Staging goes darkStaging, admin panels and internal tools stop being findable from the internet, which retires the class of incident that starts with someone scanning a cloud IP range.Zero Trust Network Access
- Every cloud, one policyWorkloads in more than one cloud, plus the SaaS the company itself runs on, sit under one contextual policy rather than one policy per provider console.Secure Cloud Access
- Partners & contractorsExternal engineers and agencies get the specific tool in scope, time-boxed, without a network position that lets them look sideways.Third-Party Access
- No hop in the data pathThe platform brokers the decision and stays out of the traffic: sessions run device to application, so the security layer is not the thing your latency graph blames.Privacy First
- Evidence for diligence202 event types, 11 report types and 7 SIEM export formats, so the customer security questionnaire is answered from exports rather than from screenshots.Compliance
The numbers this vertical gets asked for.
- Production sessionsSSH, RDP, database and console access issued per identity and recorded for replay
- Internal exposureStaging, admin panels and internal tools answer no unauthenticated inbound
- Multi-cloudOne contextual policy across clouds and SaaS, not one per provider console
- Data pathSplit plane: the decision is brokered, the traffic goes device to application
- OffboardingDirectory-driven: one removal ends every session the identity fed
- Diligence evidence202 event types, 11 report types, 7 SIEM export formats
Production accessbecomes a record.
Three things that change the first week production stops being a network destination.
Every session has a name on it
Production work is attributable to a person and a device, with a replayable record, instead of a shared credential and a best guess at who used it.
Nothing internal is findable
Staging, admin panels and internal tools stop answering the internet, which removes the entry point most SaaS incidents actually start from.
Diligence closes from exports
The access-control section of a customer's security review answers from reports the platform already produces, rather than from a fortnight of screenshotting.
Production reached by identity,
with nothing in the data path.
- Identity signals
- Device signals
- Network signals
- Application signals
You can verify identity, device, network, and app on every request. One decision engine evaluates all four before a single packet reaches anything — not four separate tools.
The security layer leaves the traffic alone. The decision is brokered and the session runs device to application, so adding governance to production does not add a hop to every request.
One console, not five. ZTNA, ZTAA, IAM, MFA, and SSO — retire the point products.
We are enterprise-grade compliant. Architecture aligned to NIST SP 800-207 and CSA SDP; supports the controls required by PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, SOX, and ISO 27001.
Privileged sessions are recorded and exportable. Who reached production, from what device, and what happened inside the session: the three questions a customer's security review always asks.
- NIST SP 800-207
- ISO 27001
- CSA SDP
"decision": "allow"“It behaves like a natural extension of our own network. No latency complaints, and we scaled it fast.”
Every review below is a verified G2 review, published as written.
Read them on G2SaaS & Digital Native, answered.
Tap a question. If yours is not here, a specialist for this sector can answer it.
Talk to a specialistSee it running against your own apps.
A 30-minute walkthrough, tailored to your stack and deployment: cloud, on-premise or hybrid.
Book a demo